Why should the law care about what I do behind closed doors?

Your speech is free. But if it causes malicious harm to someone, you can be sued.

But what if you're raping little girls behind closed doors? Killing gay men? Watching child porn?

If evidence arises that you are doing these things behind closed doors, don't you think the government has a moral obligation to investigate?

How far back into your childhood can your remember and what is your favorite memory of that time?

You can stand on a public sidewalk and take pictures of my house. You can't walk into my house uninvited and start taking pictures.

The law shouldn't care (if you are a law abiding citizen) about who you take into the bedroom as long as they are consenting adults. How many guns you own. What you eat for supper. What kind of TV shows you watch. Whether you watch porn or not.

Liberty is not boundless. It does have its limits.

What would happen if the US government told the British government in no uncertain terms all RAF bases with USAF personnel now must follow the Constitution and us law, and if the UK tried to defy this, the US military would directly attack the UK?

The law doesn't care about what you do behind closed doors as long as it is within the bounds of what the law allows.

Society sets laws announcing those actions that it deems unacceptable in polite society. If evidence appears that causes a reasonable person to suspect that illegal activity is going on, society should investigate. Of course society might find itself having to jump through hoops by adhering to constitutional law. It cannot just invade your personal space and demand to know what you're up to just because they don't like you.

It shouldn't to a point.

US valley fever cases may be 18 times higher than reported - CIDRAP